e1000 still
James_Martin at ao.uscourts.gov
James_Martin at ao.uscourts.gov
Tue Mar 22 14:51:57 UTC 2005
I agree. The less hacking the better. Red Hat could easily put a sleep
variable in the init.c that is set at the syslinux command line. Have you
type something like:
linux network_wait=30
That parameter would then be passed to init which would then wait the
specified amount of time. Changing your network configuration to
accommodate a operating system install is ridiculous.
Jeremy/Paul, opinions?
James
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
kickstart-list-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 03/21/2005 07:42:13 PM:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 15:29, James_Martin at ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
> > This is an age old problem going back to my RH 7.2 days.
>
> Yes, this is old news, hashed over on several lists, in many threads.
> James solution may help the original post-er to this thread, who was
> doing remote installs, with no access to the switches.
>
> The point, or mine anyway, is that hacking the code or having to modify
> switch configurations to be able to install the OS, are poor
> alternatives to be faced with. How is this not a problem with anaconda,
> and why hasn't RedHat owned it / fixed it?
>
> -Ed
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kickstart-list mailing list
> Kickstart-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
More information about the Kickstart-list
mailing list