[libvirt] version script and non-existent symbols

John Levon levon at movementarian.org
Mon Dec 15 21:51:16 UTC 2008

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:32:03PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> > It's actually not clear to me why some of these are even in the version
> > script. For example, why is brSetEnableSTP() there?
> It is used from the network_driver.c file, and that is linked to the
> daemon

Hmm I'd missed that. A weird source code setup?

> reason. Then, if we build drivers as dlopen()'able modules, even more

Oh, I forgot about that. OK. What is the purpose of the dlopen()
version? Are people to be expected to deliver modules separately? Is it
just a minimisation thing?


More information about the libvir-list mailing list