[Libvir] [RFC] Add Container support to libvirt

[Dan Smith]

DL> Would init or boot make sense in this case as well?  I'm open to
DL> changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone.

I think that "init" is a widely-recognized term for the master process
in a given process namespace.  I would also think that, at least from
a libvirt perspective, most people would be interested in having an
init-like process structure within their containers.  Thus, I would
vote for using <init> over <boot> or <application>.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20080116/6181f78f/attachment-0001.sig>