[libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Implement variable length structure allocator

Dave Allan dallan at redhat.com
Wed Apr 7 16:49:46 UTC 2010

On 04/07/2010 10:17 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 06:59 AM, Dave Allan wrote:
>>> Then again, fixing the type for your new method would imply fixing the
>>> typing of virAlloc and friends as well.
> Daniel's arguments are convincing; it's okay to keep the ugly cast in
> the implementation if it makes the header easier to use without having
> to embed a cast in the #define.


>> Is everybody ok with having this allocator, btw?
> You have my ACK, but I'm only a (small) fraction of everybody.  But
> since no one is using them yet, is it worth waiting until after 0.8.0 to
> push?

Waiting is a good idea; the patch has been hanging around my development 
box for weeks, so there's no hurry.


More information about the libvir-list mailing list