[libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Implement variable length structure allocator

Dave Allan dallan at redhat.com
Wed Apr 14 17:31:15 UTC 2010

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:49:46PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 10:17 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >On 04/06/2010 06:59 AM, Dave Allan wrote:
> >>>Then again, fixing the type for your new method would imply fixing the
> >>>typing of virAlloc and friends as well.
> >
> >Daniel's arguments are convincing; it's okay to keep the ugly cast in
> >the implementation if it makes the header easier to use without having
> >to embed a cast in the #define.
> Agreed.
> >>Is everybody ok with having this allocator, btw?
> >
> >You have my ACK, but I'm only a (small) fraction of everybody.  But
> >since no one is using them yet, is it worth waiting until after 0.8.0 to
> >push?
> Waiting is a good idea; the patch has been hanging around my
> development box for weeks, so there's no hurry.
> Dave

Can I get another ack for this patch now that 0.8.0 is out?


More information about the libvir-list mailing list