[libvirt] retiring v0.9.6-maint
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Sep 18 08:36:13 UTC 2014
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
> already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
> (http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
> only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was released in January 2013
> was the backport of a single CVE fix. The branch no longer builds
> cleanly on Fedora 20, and while I could identify patches to backport to
> fix the build situation, it's not worth my time if we can just retire
> the branch.
FWIW, I'm not really a fan of deleting the branches. Is there any harm
to just leaving it there idle ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list