[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: snapshot: post error when create internal system checkpoint snapshot with rbd backend
Shanzhi Yu
shyu at redhat.com
Fri Feb 27 09:14:45 UTC 2015
On 02/19/2015 10:35 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 11.02.2015 16:57, Shanzhi Yu wrote:
>> When create internel system checkpoint snapshot with source file based
>> on rbd backend, libvirt miss to check if the format of source file
>> support internal snapshot.
>>
>> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179533
>> Signed-off-by: Shanzhi Yu <shyu at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> index 26fc6a2..6dd0a5c 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> @@ -13423,8 +13423,7 @@ qemuDomainSnapshotPrepare(virConnectPtr conn,
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> if (dom_disk->src->type == VIR_STORAGE_TYPE_NETWORK &&
>> - (dom_disk->src->protocol == VIR_STORAGE_NET_PROTOCOL_SHEEPDOG ||
>> - dom_disk->src->protocol == VIR_STORAGE_NET_PROTOCOL_RBD)) {
>> + dom_disk->src->protocol == VIR_STORAGE_NET_PROTOCOL_SHEEPDOG) {
>> break;
>> }
>> if (vm->def->disks[i]->src->format > 0 &&
>>
> This check was introduced in b57e0153. I wonder what has changed since
> than. I'm not that familiar with snapshots nor ceph. But the whole if()
> block seems redundant to me. I mean, whether we know how to create a
> snapshot for given disk is checked a few lines above in
> qemuDomainSnapshotPrepareDiskInternal().
> Therefore I think it can be removed whole, the if() block.
Thanks for review, will try to a v2
> Michal
--
Regards
shyu
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list