[libvirt] [PATCH v2] docs: formatdomain: Document the CPU feature 'name' attribute

Kashyap Chamarthy kchamart at redhat.com
Thu Jan 25 14:33:58 UTC 2018


On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:17:22AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >>
> >>> +        <code>name</code> attribute. For example, to explicitly specify
> >>
> >> s/specify/require
> > 
> > I used the verb 'specify' to indicate that there is an _action_ to be
> > taken.  To my non-native ears: "to explicitly require" sounds slightly
> > odd when asking to take an action.
> > 
> > But I'll defer to your native tounge intuition.
> > 
> 
> FWIW: I noted require because the generated XML in the example is:
> 
>  <feature policy='require' name='pcid'/>
> 
> I'm OK with the change from v3, but the XML is what I was keying off.
> Essentially the line (to me) says, this domain requires a CPU that is
> required to have the 'pcid' feature. Perhaps just being too literal though.

Ah, I see where you're coming from now.  

If you're merging v3, feel free to tweak it.

Thanks.

[...]

-- 
/kashyap




More information about the libvir-list mailing list