[libvirt] [PATCH v2 17/25] conf: Add <filesystem model='virtio-9p-{non-}transitional'/>

Cole Robinson crobinso at redhat.com
Wed Feb 6 17:46:50 UTC 2019


On 1/29/19 8:49 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 16:32 -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> [...]
>> +++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>> @@ -2499,6 +2499,15 @@
>>            </element>
>>          </optional>
>>        </interleave>
>> +      <optional>
>> +        <attribute name="model">
>> +          <choice>
>> +            <value>virtio-9p</value>
>> +            <value>virtio-9p-transitional</value>
>> +            <value>virtio-9p-non-transitional</value>
> 
> I thought there was rough consensus on having separate 'model'
> and 'protocol' attributes, with the former using the same values
> as other VirtIO devices, but looking through the archives I've
> found
> 
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-January/msg00799.html
> 
> where you said you were going this route for v2... Sorry I didn't
> notice earlier and thus didn't have a chance to yell :)
> 
> I think being consistent with other devices is more important than,
> for lack of a better term, "marketing" virtio-fs.
> 
> Moreover, management applications like virt-manager and Cockpit
> will probably present this as a single drop-down to users, so it
> hardly matters that it ultimately ends up being translated to two
> separate attributes and what the corresponding values are.
> 

Okay I'll go with the protocol= syntax danpb suggested

Thanks,
Cole




More information about the libvir-list mailing list