[libvirt] [PATCH v2 24/25] qemu: Support scsi controller model=virtio-{non-}transitional

Andrea Bolognani abologna at redhat.com
Thu Feb 7 08:47:54 UTC 2019


On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:33 -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 1/31/19 11:02 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I guess I just don't see a reason *not* to implement it. But if
> > Cole doesn't want to go through with it that's fine, I can just
> > post patches later myself :)
> 
> My reason for objection was to not bog down the patch series with 
> essentially tangential discussions. If I added the patch here, and it 
> prompted a big discussion, it could block the whole series (this should 
> all be committed as a single unit so apps can key off a single 
> domaincapabilities field or libvirt version to determine if 
> -transitional support is in place)

This is why I suggested earlier that it could be its own separate
patch, to be either squashed into this one or dropped entirely based
on feedback.

> It's also kind of new territory to add a model that's essentially an 
> alias like pavel points out, which potentially deserves a wider 
> discussion, and buried in a big series isn't really the place IMO. Plus 
> I wanted to dig a bit into the archives to see why model=virtio-scsi 
> naming was chosen in the first place, maybe there was a specific 
> argument for that naming.
> 
> All that said, I'm not opposed to the idea and it is on my list to look 
> into after this series is committed. It's just very much a side issue 
> here IMO

Yeah, doing it as a follow-up works too, as long as we can squeeze
everything into the same libvirt release if we decide to go for it.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization




More information about the libvir-list mailing list