[Libvirt-cim] Best practices for patchsets

Kaitlin Rupert kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Nov 28 16:21:24 UTC 2007


Heidi Eckhart wrote:
> Dan Smith wrote:
>> JG> I figured this one would be the most likely to generate
>> JG> discussion.  I took a couple of stabs at the right suffix while I
>> JG> was writing this, then just decided to go with something and let
>> JG> everyone throw ideas out.  Maybe we could go with something more
>> JG> succinct like just "#x".  So "AllocationCapabilities EnumInstance"
>> JG> followed by "AllocationCapabilities EnumInstance #2" sort of
>> JG> thing.
>>
>> Sure.  I'd prefer a shorter prefix, so just " #x" is fine with me.
> Agreed, a short prefix is a very good eye catcher. I'd prefer to have 
> the prefix at the beginning of the message. The subjects are sometimes 
> that long, that they are not completely shown in the email client's 
> preview pane.
>
I think having the revision number at the beginning is a good 
suggestion.  I'm an offender of the sometimes long e-mail subject.  ;)

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert at us.ibm.com





More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list