[Libvirt-cim] Best practices for patchsets
Kaitlin Rupert
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Nov 28 16:21:24 UTC 2007
Heidi Eckhart wrote:
> Dan Smith wrote:
>> JG> I figured this one would be the most likely to generate
>> JG> discussion. I took a couple of stabs at the right suffix while I
>> JG> was writing this, then just decided to go with something and let
>> JG> everyone throw ideas out. Maybe we could go with something more
>> JG> succinct like just "#x". So "AllocationCapabilities EnumInstance"
>> JG> followed by "AllocationCapabilities EnumInstance #2" sort of
>> JG> thing.
>>
>> Sure. I'd prefer a shorter prefix, so just " #x" is fine with me.
> Agreed, a short prefix is a very good eye catcher. I'd prefer to have
> the prefix at the beginning of the message. The subjects are sometimes
> that long, that they are not completely shown in the email client's
> preview pane.
>
I think having the revision number at the beginning is a good
suggestion. I'm an offender of the sometimes long e-mail subject. ;)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert at us.ibm.com
More information about the Libvirt-cim
mailing list