[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init

[Deepti B Kalakeri]

Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision number before 
including this field ?
I think if we run this version on the F9, will it not fail ?

Regards,
Deepti

zli at linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
> # Date 1208509526 -28800
> # Node ID 4ee138efe1ef8332366db16b30fd777bae8b2a08
> # Parent  1fc0ff2248ae99860b83abb5ce8952df82218798
> [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init
>
> Provider code already has this NetRASD Address as the mac.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
>
> diff -r 1fc0ff2248ae -r 4ee138efe1ef suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py
> --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py	Fri Apr 18 17:00:16 2008 +0800
> +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py	Fri Apr 18 17:05:26 2008 +0800
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ def get_dasd_class(virt):
>
>  class CIM_NetResourceAllocationSettingData(CIMClassMOF):
>      def __init__(self, type, mac, name):
> +        self.Address = mac
>          self.NetworkType = type
>          if type == 'ethernet' or type == 'bridge' :
>              self.ResourceType = RASD_TYPE_NET_ETHER
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
>