[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init

[Dan Smith]

DK> Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision number
DK> before including this field ?  I think if we run this version on
DK> the F9, will it not fail ?

No, it won't fail just because you give it more information than it
needs, it just won't use that value.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20080418/17103b2c/attachment.sig>