[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 2 of 3] [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02

Zhengang Li zli at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jun 4 05:41:22 UTC 2008


Kaitlin Rupert wrote:

> zli at linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
>> # Date 1208332735 -28800
>> # Node ID 32614eca2a5579389cc5b262eff8243b0ca2da82
>> # Parent  7c20d87e25c0cd53deba4dc8c48529d84bb740d9
>> [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
>>
>> diff -r 7c20d87e25c0 -r 32614eca2a55 
>> suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Profile/02_profile_to_elec.py
> 
> This is a nice clean up and looks good to me.  However, the test fails 
> due to the "Address field missing from vsms.py" issue Deepti noted in 
> her e-mail about Dan's emulator fix.
> 
> For the Address fix, we'll need conditional behavior based on the 
> changeset.  So I'll hold off on applying this set.

I saw this patch when I was trying to update the cim_define() support 
for KVM and others.
Is this still true that we'll need to do conditional behavior on
changeset?

> 


-- 
- Zhengang




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list