[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 2 of 3] [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Zhengang Li wrote:
> Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> 
>> zli at linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
>>> # Date 1208332735 -28800
>>> # Node ID 32614eca2a5579389cc5b262eff8243b0ca2da82
>>> # Parent  7c20d87e25c0cd53deba4dc8c48529d84bb740d9
>>> [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg at cn.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> diff -r 7c20d87e25c0 -r 32614eca2a55 
>>> suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Profile/02_profile_to_elec.py
>>
>> This is a nice clean up and looks good to me.  However, the test fails 
>> due to the "Address field missing from vsms.py" issue Deepti noted in 
>> her e-mail about Dan's emulator fix.
>>
>> For the Address fix, we'll need conditional behavior based on the 
>> changeset.  So I'll hold off on applying this set.
> 
> I saw this patch when I was trying to update the cim_define() support 
> for KVM and others.
> Is this still true that we'll need to do conditional behavior on
> changeset?

I've tagged a release of the cimtest tree.  So now, we'll be able to 
check out a release that is tied to the latest release of libvirt-cim.

You won't need to use the conditional branch on this patch.

Sorry for the slow reply!
-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com