[Libvirt-cim] Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource

[Guo Lian Yun]

libvirt-cim-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-18 03:47:56:

> >  >
> >  > The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
> >  >
> >  > 1) If SBLIM:  Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
> >  > 2) If not SBLIM:  Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
> >  >
> > 
> >   If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base 
> > provider installed,
> >   how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will 
return 
> > NULL through
> >   HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what 
should 
> > we do?
> > 
> 
> This will be changed in the future.  The problem is that 
> Linux_ComputerSystem lives in a different namespace, so we need to make 
> the association providers handle the different namespaces.
> 
> In the SBLIM case, you'll want to use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of 
> HostSystem.  However, we don't support that yet.  I'd add a bug to the 
> cimtest wiki and then have the tests XFAIL in the situation where you 
> need to use Linux_ComputerSystem to resolve an association.

  Then how to verify the test use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of 
  HostSystem in test? One way is to check if sblim base provider is 
installed,
  the other way is to check the return instance of enumerate HostSystem. 
  Any other suggestion? 

  Thanks!

> 
> -- 
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20080918/da215380/attachment.htm>