[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] for cimtest

Kaitlin Rupert kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Jan 16 17:00:35 UTC 2010


Osier Yang wrote:
> Hi kaitlin.
> I tested on three machines.
> 
> ===Machine A===
> [root at dhcp-66-70-159 ~]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2045656 Jan 14 08:40 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jan 14 06:15 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1953468 Jan  8 14:28 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Dec 21 18:51 
> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen.hmac
> 
> [root at dhcp-66-70-159 ~]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | egrep -v 'xen' | 
> tail -n1
> /boot/.vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
> 
> ==Machine B====
> [root at dhcp-66-70-128 tmp]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      22 Jan 15 10:52 vmlinuz -> 
> vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1931964 Dec 23 13:44 vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1931580 Aug  1 05:02 vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2029233 Aug  1 05:02 vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5xen
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jul 28 05:41 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5.hmac
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Jul 14  2009 
> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5xen.hmac
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jul 14  2009 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5.hmac
> 
> [root at dhcp-66-70-128 tmp]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | egrep -v 'xen' | 
> tail -n1
> /boot/.vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5.hmac
> 
> ======Machine C===============
> [root at amd-4450b-4-1 ~]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1953468 Jan 12 21:29 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2045656 Jan 12 21:29 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Dec 22 07:51 
> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen.hmac
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Dec 22 07:43 .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
> 
> [root at amd-4450b-4-1 ~]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | grep -v 'xen' | 
> tail -n1
> /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
> 
> so,  the result depends on the access time of ".vmlinuz-*.hmac".

Ah, good call!  Thanks for tracking this down.

> 
> that means the patch is not useless.  :)

Yep, agreed.  I've applied your patch.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks and Regards
> osier


-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list