[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] for cimtest

[Osier Yang]

Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> Osier Yang wrote:
>> Hi kaitlin.
>> I tested on three machines.
>>
>> ===Machine A===
>> [root at dhcp-66-70-159 ~]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2045656 Jan 14 08:40 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jan 14 06:15 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1953468 Jan  8 14:28 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Dec 21 18:51 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen.hmac
>>
>> [root at dhcp-66-70-159 ~]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | egrep -v 'xen' 
>> | tail -n1
>> /boot/.vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
>>
>> ==Machine B====
>> [root at dhcp-66-70-128 tmp]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      22 Jan 15 10:52 vmlinuz -> 
>> vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1931964 Dec 23 13:44 vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1931580 Aug  1 05:02 vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2029233 Aug  1 05:02 vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5xen
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jul 28 05:41 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5.hmac
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Jul 14  2009 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5xen.hmac
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Jul 14  2009 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-158.el5.hmac
>>
>> [root at dhcp-66-70-128 tmp]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | egrep -v 
>> 'xen' | tail -n1
>> /boot/.vmlinuz-2.6.18-160.el5.hmac
>>
>> ======Machine C===============
>> [root at amd-4450b-4-1 ~]# ls -laut /boot/ | grep vmlinuz
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1953468 Jan 12 21:29 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2045656 Jan 12 21:29 vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     161 Dec 22 07:51 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5xen.hmac
>> -rw-r--r--  1 root root     158 Dec 22 07:43 
>> .vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5.hmac
>>
>> [root at amd-4450b-4-1 ~]# find /boot/ | grep vmlinuz | grep -v 'xen' | 
>> tail -n1
>> /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-183.el5
>>
>> so,  the result depends on the access time of ".vmlinuz-*.hmac".
>
> Ah, good call!  Thanks for tracking this down.
>
>>
>> that means the patch is not useless.  :)
>
> Yep, agreed.  I've applied your patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
     Thanks. :) 
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> osier
>
>