[PATCH] new audit rule interface

[Dustin Kirkland]

On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:10 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Good points Debbie.  And just to add fuel to the fire, if we're concerned about
> verbosity and readability, why not just:
>  
> audit_transport

I think that unfortunately looses the fact that this is a data structure
representing an "audit rule".

Honestly, if everyone knows and understands that xprt=transport, then
this will work ok.  There are certainly more offensive data types and
variable names else in the kernel.

:-Dustin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20060106/fd0e1e03/attachment.sig>