[PATCH] new audit rule interface
Amy Griffis
amy.griffis at hp.com
Fri Jan 6 20:14:33 UTC 2006
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:58:29PM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:10 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > Good points Debbie. And just to add fuel to the fire, if we're
> > concerned about verbosity and readability, why not just:
> >
> > audit_transport
>
> I think that unfortunately looses the fact that this is a data structure
> representing an "audit rule".
That's true.
The more I think about it, I don't really like xprt/transport.
Looking through the kernel sources, the only code that uses xprt
meaning transport is RPC code. I'd prefer to avoid any unwarranted
associations with RPC. I also don't think transport accurately
describes what's happening here.
How about audit_rule_data? I would personally prefer that to
audit_rule_xprt.
Amy
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list