[PATCH] new audit rule interface
Dustin Kirkland
dustin.kirkland at us.ibm.com
Fri Jan 6 20:51:38 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:14 -0500, Amy Griffis wrote:
> The more I think about it, I don't really like xprt/transport.
> Looking through the kernel sources, the only code that uses xprt
> meaning transport is RPC code. I'd prefer to avoid any unwarranted
> associations with RPC. I also don't think transport accurately
> describes what's happening here.
>
> How about audit_rule_data? I would personally prefer that to
> audit_rule_xprt.
I like audit_rule_data better than *_xprt.
Or even audit_rule_ext (for "extended").
:-Dustin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20060106/ab707189/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list