[RFC] Virtual Key Fields
Eric Paris
eparis at redhat.com
Mon Mar 24 13:42:14 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 09:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on the discussion last week, I'd like to propose a technique of allowing
> the appearance of multiple key fields without having to make changes in the
> kernel. The kernel has one key field associated with each audit rule. It
> doesn't look at the field's contents for anything. A patch will be submitted
> for 2.6.26 kernel increasing the size of string the kernel will accept. The
> kernel will still allocate the minimum memory needed to hold the string.
I really like it. I think it is a good solution to the problem you were
trying to solve.
> Auditctl will also allow delete all rules matching a key. This will allow the
> admin or a program to delete a set of rules related to just a particular key
> and leave all other rules intact.
How does this work? This is a completely new concept and it seems like
it should be a second patch after you have multiple keys in to start
with.
auditctl -a exit,always -w /tmp/file1 -k file1 -k shared-key
auditctl -a exit,always -w /tmp/file2 -k file2 -k shared-key
now if I say (and i'm just guessing your new syntax):
auditctl -d -k shared-key
what do I end up with? no rules? still 2 rules but without the -k
shared-key?
I really think this part of the proposal needs to be explained a whole
lot more before I buy into it. I'm scared of trying to remove rules by
key and getting unanticipated results....
-Eric
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list