[RFC] Virtual Key Fields

Eric Paris eparis at redhat.com
Mon Mar 24 13:42:14 UTC 2008


On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 09:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Based on the discussion last week, I'd like to propose a technique of allowing 
> the appearance of multiple key fields without having to make changes in the 
> kernel. The kernel has one key field associated with each audit rule. It 
> doesn't look at the field's contents for anything. A patch will be submitted 
> for 2.6.26 kernel increasing the size of string the kernel will accept. The 
> kernel will still allocate the minimum memory needed to hold the string.

I really like it.  I think it is a good solution to the problem you were
trying to solve.


> Auditctl will also allow delete all rules matching a key. This will allow the 
> admin or a program to delete a set of rules related to just a particular key 
> and leave all other rules intact.

How does this work?  This is a completely new concept and it seems like
it should be a second patch after you have multiple keys in to start
with.

auditctl -a exit,always -w /tmp/file1 -k file1 -k shared-key
auditctl -a exit,always -w /tmp/file2 -k file2 -k shared-key

now if I say (and i'm just guessing your new syntax):

auditctl -d -k shared-key

what do I end up with?  no rules?  still 2 rules but without the -k
shared-key?

I really think this part of the proposal needs to be explained a whole
lot more before I buy into it.  I'm scared of trying to remove rules by
key and getting unanticipated results....

-Eric




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list