[Linux-cluster] Interfacing csnap to cluster stack
Daniel McNeil
daniel at osdl.org
Fri Oct 8 20:39:04 UTC 2004
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 13:02, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:34 -0700, Daniel McNeil wrote:
>
> > These ioctls are ugly. Shouldn't there be a library interface for
> > getting this info? We all agreed there should be an API for
> > membership and quorum. There should be an API for both the
> > kernel and user-land. csnap should NOT use ioctls.
>
> Fortunately, those "ioctls" aren't part of the csnap code; they're part
> of plugin code used by magma to talk to CMAN.
>
> The plugins implement libmagma's actual communication with different
> cluster infrastructures, which is [ugly] ioctls in the case of CMAN and
> libgulm's API in the case of GuLM.
>
> -- Lon
Yes, I know that csnap does not use the ioctl's, but Daniel said:
"Maybe csnap will end up talking to it the same way, who knows. I just
always feel like I got something icky on myself when I call an ioctl."
I was just agreeing that the ioctls are ugly and csnap should not
use the ioctls directly.
Why doesn't cman have a libcman?
Daniel
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list