[Linux-cluster] RHCS 3 "could not connect to service manager"
Karl Podesta
kpodesta at redbrick.dcu.ie
Wed Nov 15 12:45:02 UTC 2006
We have just discovered that the bonding is configured differently on
each node (p1 is configured for load balancing, p2 is configured for
active-backup). We're curious if this bonding configuration could be
interfering with the service relocation... could it be a reason why
the connection times out... something akin to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149867
(bonding contributing to a system hang after a period of time)
Does this sound familiar to anyone? Has anyone encoutered anything like
this in their experience?
Many thanks!
Karl
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:10:19PM +0000, Karl Podesta wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When we try to relocate a service between a basic 2-node RHCS 3 setup, we
> get the following error message:
>
> "Member p2 trying to relocate oracle to p1. msg-open: connection timed out.
> Could not connect to service manager."
>
> This also happens if a node in the cluster fails: the service does not
> relocate to the other node. There is only the one service on the cluster
> (oracle). The cluster is 2 x Dell 2850 with shared SAN storage,
> RHAS Update 5, kernel 2.4.21-32.EL SMP for x_64.
>
> What are the reasons that could cause this failure in relocation to happen?
>
> Many thanks for any thoughts or suggestions you have!
>
> Regards,
> Karl
>
> --
> Karl Podesta
> Systems Engineer, Securelinx Ltd.
> http://www.securelinx.com/
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're
entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The
answer is: No.
-- What was the question again?, "The Springfield Files"
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list