[Linux-cluster] piranha

[Riaan van Niekerk]

hi Pedro

Care to tell us what you did to the real servers?

If this is an omission in the documentation, please file a bugzilla 
against the RHCS manual.

tnx
Riaan

Huesser Peter wrote:
> I found the solution. One also has to manipulate the real webservers. 
> This is not described in the official “Red Hat Cluster Suite” documentation.
> 
>  
> 
>             Pedro
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com 
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Huesser Peter
> *Sent:* Montag, 25. September 2006 22:54
> *To:* linux clustering
> *Subject:* RE: [Linux-cluster] piranha
> 
>  
> 
> By the way: I started the “pulse” daemon in the debug modus (“pulse –v 
> –n”) and got the following output:
> 
>  
> 
> nanny: Opening TCP socket to remote service port 80...
> 
> nanny: Connecting socket to remote address...
> 
> nanny: DEBUG -- Posting CONNECT poll()
> 
> nanny: Sending len=16, text="GET / HTTP/1.0
> 
>  
> 
> "
> 
> nanny: DEBUG -- Posting READ poll()
> 
> nanny: DEBUG -- READ poll() completed (1,1)
> 
> nanny: Posting READ I/O; expecting 4 character(s)...
> 
> nanny: DEBUG -- READ returned 4
> 
> nanny: READ expected len=4, text="HTTP"
> 
> nanny: READ got len=4, text=HTTP
> 
> nanny: avail: 1 active: 1: count: 13
> 
> pulse: DEBUG -- setting SEND_heartbeat timer
> 
> pulse: DEBUG -- setting SEND_heartbeat timer
> 
> pulse: DEBUG -- setting NEED_heartbeat timer
> 
> pulse: DEBUG -- setting SEND_heartbeat timer
> 
> nanny: Opening TCP socket to remote service port 80...
> 
> …
> 
>  
> 
> For me this looks as if everything is ok. “nanny” sends from time to 
> time a “GET / HTTP/1.0” request and the response (“HTTP” only first four 
> letters) correspondence with what is expected. The problem is that pulse 
> is not opening port 80 on the loadbalancer for reveiving http-request. A 
> “netstat –anp” verifies this.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Hello
> 
>  
> 
> I sent a similar question a few days ago and did not get any answer. 
> Maybe the time (Saturday night) was unfavorable or the question was not 
> that clear. So I try it once more:
> 
>  
> 
> I want to run a loadbalancer in front of two webserver (using direct 
> routing). But if I connect to port 80 of the loadbalancer I get a 
> “connection refused”.
> 
>  
> 
> 1)       Did anybody had a similar problem?
> 
> 2)       How can I increase the debuglevel?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks’ in advance
> 
>  
> 
>             Pedro
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: riaan.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20060928/a0e0dade/attachment.vcf>