[Linux-cluster] Active/Passive - GFS needed?

[Jonathan Brassow]

not really.  You could use cluster suite (rgmanager) for failover and  
use ext3.

  brassow

On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Brad Filipek wrote:

> I will have a two node cluster connecting to a fibre channel SAN  
> (AX150). There is only one application on the server that our users  
> will access by using telnet or SSH with a terminal emulator. If I  
> setup this two node cluster up as active/passive, is there a need  
> for GFS?
>
>
>
>
>
> Brad Filipek
> Network Administrator
> Continental Refrigerated Services, LLC.
> P- (708) 587-3640
> F- (708) 534-4699
> bfilipek at crscold.com
> http://www.crscold.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended for the use of the  
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from  
> disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is  
> not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for  
> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby  
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this  
> communication is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify us  
> immediately by email reply or by telephone and immediately delete  
> this message and any attachments.
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20070405/73461907/attachment.htm>