[Linux-cluster] Re: Question about Cluster Service

Wed Feb 28 08:07:59 UTC 2007

Hi
Thank you very much for replying to my question.
My first problem is whether I can use one node (Node
C)
as a passive for two separate cluster
service(service1,service2).
We are using SAN in our solution and I think there is
no need for Node C to have a copy of the data on A ,
because
it's a waste of storage on SAN.It should have an
access
on data on A in case of failure.(I don't know if this
is necessary to have GFS between A,C or not?)

--Regards.
Sara

--- linux-cluster-request at redhat.com wrote:

> Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to
> 	linux-cluster at redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	linux-cluster-request at redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	linux-cluster-owner at redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. clurgmgrd[6147]: <warning> Starving for lock
> usrm::rg="SDA
>       database" (James Lapthorn)
>    2. Re: Question about Cluster Service (sara
> sodagar)
>    3. GFS 6.1 crashed (glock.c) (Dirk Haller)
>    4. Re: Re: Question about Cluster Service (Robert
> Peterson)
>    5. Re: CS4 Update 4 / Oops in dlm module (Lon
> Hohberger)
>       (Alain Moulle)
>    6. failover domain issue (Dave Berry)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:42:56 -0000 (UTC)
> From: "James Lapthorn"
> <james.lapthorn at lapthornconsulting.com>
> Subject: [Linux-cluster] clurgmgrd[6147]: <warning>
> Starving for lock
> 	usrm::rg="SDA database"
> To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
>
<49900.193.133.138.40.1172572976.squirrel at lapthorn.biz>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I have a 4 node cluster running RH Cluster Suite 4. 
> I have just added a
> DB2 service to one of the nodes and have starting
> gettingerrors relating
> to locks ion the system log.  I plan to restart this
> node at luch time
> today to see if this fixes the problem.
> 
> Is there anyone who can explain what these errors
> relate to so that I can
> understand the problem better.   I have checked RHN,
> Cluster Project
> website and Google and I cant find anything?
> 
> Its worth mentioning that the service is running
> fine.
> 
> Feb 27 10:18:40 leoukldb2 clurgmgrd[6147]: <warning>
> Starving for lock
> usrm::rg="SDA database"
> Feb 27 10:19:40 leoukldb2 last message repeated 2
> times
> Feb 27 10:21:10 leoukldb2 last message repeated 3
> times
> Feb 27 10:22:55 leoukldb2 last message repeated 2
> times
> Feb 27 10:22:55 leoukldb2 clurgmgrd[6147]: <err>
> #48: Unable to obtain
> cluster lock: Connection timed out
> Feb 27 10:23:40 leoukldb2 clurgmgrd[6147]: <err>
> #50: Unable to obtain
> cluster lock: Connection timed out
> Feb 27 10:24:25 leoukldb2 clurgmgrd[6147]: <err>
> #48: Unable to obtain
> cluster lock: Connection timed out
> Feb 27 10:24:55 leoukldb2 clurgmgrd[6147]: <warning>
> Node
> ID:211c013b0000000b stuck with lock usrm::rg="SDA
> database"
> 
> _________________________________
> This email has been ClamScanned !
>           www.clamav.net
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:14:41 -0800 (PST)
> From: sara sodagar <sara_sodagar at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: Question about Cluster
> Service
> To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <483373.69806.qm at web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Thanks a lot for replying to my question.
> Actually I have to distribute data on my web servers
> as
> we are using a provisioning software and it just
> uses
> this architecture.
> My plan is to setup 2 active servers that do not
> share
> any data , and one passive server which is for both
> of
> them.
> Node A ,C    (cluster service 1)
> Node B , C   (cluster service 2)
> Node c :   (Failover domain 1 : service 1,failover
> domain2: service 2)
> I want to setup GFS between A,C  and another pair
> B,C
> My main question is whether I should use GFS or not
> ?
> I am confused about whether I should use GFS when I
> am
> using High availability service management from
> Cluster suite.
> 
> --Regards.
> Sara
> 
> --- linux-cluster-request at redhat.com wrote:
> 
> > Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to
> > 	linux-cluster at redhat.com
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
> Web,
> > visit
> > 
> >
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> > 'help' to
> > 	linux-cluster-request at redhat.com
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > 	linux-cluster-owner at redhat.com
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> > is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. Re: Question about Cluster Service (Filipe
> > Miranda)
> >    2. Re: Problem running GFS on top of AoE
> > (Shailesh)
> >    3. Re: data and machine dependent NFS GFS file
> > xfer	problem
> >       (Keith Lewis)
> >    4. Re: data and machine dependent NFS GFS file
> > xfer	problem
> >       (Robert Peterson)
> >    5. Re: Running GFS as local file system
> (Jonathan
> > E Brassow)
> > 
> > 
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:19:52 -0300
> > From: "Filipe Miranda" <filipe.miranda at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Question about
> Cluster
> > Service
> > To: "linux clustering" <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
> > Message-ID:
> > 
> >
>
<a6d13c780702251519g3255e3b3le719a490ee6a1814 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > 
> > Hi there Sodagar,
> > 
> > Will the Web servers present the same data? will
> > they serve the same
> > content?
> > Why not use all three servers active (without the
> > fail-over mode) and just
> > add a layer of load balancing to the top of this
> > solution (two machines with
> 
=== message truncated ===

____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097