Réf. : Re: [Linux-cluster] Problem with fenced on cluster with 2 BladeCenter machines: 1st machine is remove physically. The remaining one does not became Active (waiting for fenced)
catalin.lupescu at bull.net
catalin.lupescu at bull.net
Thu Jul 12 16:08:47 UTC 2007
Hello!
I have change to 10 and also to 20.
Nothing change (still the same pb)
Best regards!
Catalin LUPESCU
VoIP & Signalling Support
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
Tél : 01.30.80.75.43
http://www.bull.com
James Parsons <jparsons at redhat.com>
Envoyé par : linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com
12/07/2007 17:02
Veuillez répondre à linux clustering
Pour : linux clustering <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
cc :
Objet : Re: [Linux-cluster] Problem with fenced on cluster with 2 BladeCenter
machines: 1st machine is remove physically. The remaining one does not
became Active (waiting for fenced)
catalin.lupescu at bull.net wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have a Cluster Redhat made with 2 nodes IBM blades on Blade Center
> chassis.
> (fenced version 1.32.6)
>
> I have done the following test:
> I have removed physically the node 1 machine (the Active one).
> The second one is never became active one. "Clustat" command does not
> printing any information.
> In /var/log/messages we can found the following messages (repeated):
>
> Jul 11 17:46:24 cdrc1-2 fenced[4214]: fencing node "cdrc1-1"
> Jul 11 17:46:38 cdrc1-2 fenced[4214]: agent "fence_bladecenter"
> reports: pattern match timed-out at /sbin/fence_bladecenter line 185
> Jul 11 17:46:38 cdrc1-2 fenced[4214]: fence "cdrc1-1" failed
>
> If the node 1 is plugged, the node 2 became Active (fenced OK)
>
bz#240509 changed the sleep timeout in the bladecenter agent from 5 to
10...this is on or about line 193 in /sbin/fence_bladecenter. See what
yours is set at, and try pushing it out a bit. This minor change is
making its way through the distribution chain now.
-j
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20070712/9a2a3c58/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list