[Linux-cluster] Very poor performance of GFS2
Jordi Prats
jprats at cesca.es
Mon Jun 25 06:48:05 UTC 2007
I supose you say so because the disk could be slow, but it should not be
this slow because they virtual machines and they are accesing the same
way as is the local disk. (Both are LVM volumes)
I found almost no documentation about how to install GFS2, so I'm
assuming I did something wrong. I supose GFS2 do not add about 5 minutes
of delay because of it's operations!
Jordi
David Teigland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:57:03PM +0200, Jordi Prats wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm getting a very poor performance using GFS2. Here some numbers:
>>
>> A disk usage on a GFS2 filesystem:
>>
>> [root at urani CLUSTER]# time du -hs PostgreSQL814/postgresql-8.1.4/
>> 121M PostgreSQL814/postgresql-8.1.4/
>>
>> real 5m49.597s
>> user 0m0.000s
>> sys 0m0.004s
>>
>>
>> On the local disk:
>>
>> [root at urani CLUSTER]# time du -hs postgresql-8.1.4/
>> 116M postgresql-8.1.4/
>>
>> real 0m0.015s
>> user 0m0.000s
>> sys 0m0.016s
>>
>
> You should compare with gfs1, that will tell you if the gfs2 numbers are
> in the right ballpark.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
--
......................................................................
__
/ / Jordi Prats
C E / S / C A Dept. de Sistemes
/_/ Centre de Supercomputació de Catalunya
Gran Capità, 2-4 (Edifici Nexus) · 08034 Barcelona
T. 93 205 6464 · F. 93 205 6979 · jprats at cesca.es
......................................................................
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list