[Linux-cluster] GFS RG size (and tuning)
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Fri Nov 2 20:33:09 UTC 2007
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:12:39PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Also I read your previous mailing list post with "df" issue - didn't
> have time to comment. Note that both RHEL 4.6 and RHEL 5.1 will have a
> "fast_statfs" tunable that is specifically added to speed up the "df"
> command. Give it a try. If it works well, we'll switch it from a tunable
> to default (so people don't have to suffer from GFS1's df command so much).
OK, thanks, we'll try with 5.1.
In the meantime we rebuilded all fs's with larger RGs (-r 2048), which
already improved the "df" behavior seriously.
Also, fs performance is not that bad w.r.t. bandwidth (our measurements
were first incorrect due to 32-bit counter troubles), but operations like
rsync (which we do a lot) that scan large directory trees are horrable.
For that we'll wait for 5.1.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list