[Linux-cluster] Failover with multiple interfaces
Lon Hohberger
lhh at redhat.com
Fri Nov 9 18:12:44 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:19 +0000, James Fidell wrote:
> So, I have my NFS cluster all set up, with NFS services and shared
> storage all managed over a "private" network.
>
> My intention is to join several more nodes to the cluster using the
> same storage, but providing services other than NFS. Is it possible
> at the same time to provide services on a "public" network and have
> floating public IP addresses which are also migrated across the
> failover domain when the cluster fences a node?
>
> Is it just a case of creating a second IP address service in the
> failover domain? Will the resource manager just "do the right thing"
> and bind the floating address to the correct network interface?
Yes, it binds IPs to NICs based on netmask + network.
So...
eth0 address/mask = 10.1.1.1/24
eth1 address/mask = 192.168.1.1/16
* All VIPs in the network 10.1.1.0/24 would get bound to eth0
* All VIPs in the network 192.168.0.0/16 would get bound to eth1
It doesn't matter what the cluster's using for its internal
communications.
-- Lon
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list