[Linux-cluster] partition tables not sync'd

Robert Hurst rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu
Tue Oct 2 16:13:43 UTC 2007


Silly question: you also masked that lun on the active node, right?
You could also remove the /etc/lvm/.cache and lvmdiskscan / vgscan
--mknodes

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:08 -0700, Ray Charles wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have a one year old cluster(2 nodes) in production
> that is GFS 6.1 attached to an iscsi san. Its
> currently in an active passive arrangement for
> tomcat/apache.
> 
> While the active node was busy servicing web visitors,
> I used the other node to add a lun from the san; then
> a physical volume and then a logical volume to the
> existing vol.group; then I put the file system on the
> new partition. I also have it mounted on the
> non-active node.
> 
> The active node will not recognize the new partition
> schema. I've rebooted it but it still doesn't want to
> see the new partition the other node has created.
> 
> What should I do?
> 
> 
> -tia
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
>  
> 
> 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20071002/1b387224/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list