[Linux-cluster] partition tables not sync'd

[Ray Charles]

Well, in my original attempt i did a rescan-scsi_bus,
vgscan and lvscan but the new partition didn't show
up.

I think you're on to something that i also want to try
and that's the /etc/lvm/.cache.

Any precautions? 

-tia

--- Robert Hurst <rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Silly question: you also masked that lun on the
> active node, right?
> You could also remove the /etc/lvm/.cache and
> lvmdiskscan / vgscan
> --mknodes
> 
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:08 -0700, Ray Charles
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have a one year old cluster(2 nodes) in
> production
> > that is GFS 6.1 attached to an iscsi san. Its
> > currently in an active passive arrangement for
> > tomcat/apache.
> > 
> > While the active node was busy servicing web
> visitors,
> > I used the other node to add a lun from the san;
> then
> > a physical volume and then a logical volume to the
> > existing vol.group; then I put the file system on
> the
> > new partition. I also have it mounted on the
> > non-active node.
> > 
> > The active node will not recognize the new
> partition
> > schema. I've rebooted it but it still doesn't want
> to
> > see the new partition the other node has created.
> > 
> > What should I do?
> > 
> > 
> > -tia
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >      
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a
> reality with Yahoo! Autos.
> > http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Linux-cluster mailing list
> > Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> >
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> 
> 
> > --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/