[Linux-cluster] best way to mount gfs/gfs2?
Maurizio Rottin
maurizio.rottin at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 11:03:32 UTC 2008
2008/3/17, Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com>:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:50 +0100, Maurizio Rottin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > after some bonnie++ benckmarking it seems that the more nodes
> > read or write, gfs2 is a lot better, but it seems to be very buggy. (i
> > saved 10 minutes in running bonnie++ on 3 nodes with gfs2, respect to
> > gfs)
> >
> > Anyway, my question is what's the best way to mount a gfs/gfs2 fs?
> >
> > I tried in this way:
> > 1)i created gfs(2)
> > 2)i created a failover domain for each node
> > 3)i created a shared resource serving the gfs(2)
> > 4)i created a service for each node for mounting that gfs(2) partition
> > only on that node (associating it to its failover domain composed by
> > only that node)
> >
> > Is that the right way, or are there better ways to do that, or is it
> > completely wrong?
>
>
> It's better to just use /etc/fstab and chkconfig --add the gfs/gfs2 init script...
>
> -- Lon
>
but in this way i don't get a monitor service which tells me if gfs is failed.
Plus if i want the ftp server to stay up only if the gfs is up and
fail if gfs goes down?
--
mr
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list