[Linux-cluster] best way to mount gfs/gfs2?

Maurizio Rottin maurizio.rottin at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 11:03:32 UTC 2008


2008/3/17, Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com>:
>
>  On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:50 +0100, Maurizio Rottin wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >       after some bonnie++ benckmarking it seems that the more nodes
>  > read or write, gfs2 is a lot better, but it seems to be very buggy. (i
>  > saved 10 minutes in running bonnie++ on 3 nodes with gfs2, respect to
>  > gfs)
>  >
>  > Anyway, my question is what's the best way to mount a gfs/gfs2 fs?
>  >
>  > I tried in this way:
>  > 1)i created gfs(2)
>  > 2)i created a failover domain for each node
>  > 3)i created a shared resource serving the gfs(2)
>  > 4)i created a service for each node for mounting that gfs(2) partition
>  > only on that node (associating it to its failover domain composed by
>  > only that node)
>  >
>  > Is that the right way, or are there better ways to do that, or is it
>  > completely wrong?
>
>
> It's better to just use /etc/fstab and chkconfig --add the gfs/gfs2 init script...
>
>  -- Lon
>

but in this way i don't get a monitor service which tells me if gfs is failed.
Plus if i want the ftp server to stay up only if the gfs is up and
fail if gfs goes down?

-- 
mr




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list