[Linux-cluster] gfs+nfs+lucene, anyone had tried?

Jeff Sturm jeff.sturm at eprize.com
Wed Apr 21 13:02:52 UTC 2010


We use Lucene over GFS (no NFS), but the design of our application updates Lucene from only one node at a time.

 

In general applications that utilize POSIX locking can handle concurrent updates safely on GFS even with multiple nodes.  It wasn't clear to us whether Lucene supports this, however, and in your case NFS adds a layer to the mix.

 

From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of ESGLinux
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:22 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: [Linux-cluster] gfs+nfs+lucene, anyone had tried?

 

Hi All, 

 

I´m mounting a cluster using NFS over GFS and I´m going to store a lucene index on it. 

 

There are two nodes that write in this index, and I´m worried about the index corruption.

 

So anyone have implemented something like this? any problem I can find?

 

Thanks in advance, 

 

ESG

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20100421/56313f6e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list