[Linux-cluster] Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 84, Issue 29

[prince chauhan]

*
*
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:30 PM, <linux-cluster-request at redhat.com> wrote:

> Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to
>        linux-cluster at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        linux-cluster-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        linux-cluster-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)
>   2. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Fajar A. Nugraha)
>   3. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:46:10 +0300
> From: Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list at gunduz.org>
> To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
> Subject: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4
> Message-ID: <1303710370.21043.603.camel at lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with
> active/passive cluster?
>
> I'm working on a new PostgreSQL clustering setup, and I'm hardly
> convinced that GFS2 will have more protection against ext3/4.
>
> -- of course, I'm assuming that I'm fencing both nodes properly, so that
> their connection with storage is cut off when needed.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim G?ND?Z
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 198 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> URL: <
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/f489d129/attachment.bin
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:15:10 +0700
> From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list at fajar.net>
> To: linux clustering <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikDdDK_HJrQZQcZwpJyGjzwfEEmJA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 2011/4/25 Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list at gunduz.org>
>
> >
> > Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with
> > active/passive cluster?
> >
> >
> If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives more
> performance compared to gfs(2).
>
> --
> FAN
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/2094f4f0/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:42:32 +0300
> From: Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list at gunduz.org>
> To: linux clustering <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4
> Message-ID: <1303713752.21043.622.camel at lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >
> > If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives
> > more performance compared to gfs(2).
>
> There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth
> trying then.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim G?ND?Z
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 198 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> URL: <
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.bin
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
> End of Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 84, Issue 29
> *********************************************
>



-- 
Regards,
Prince Chauhan  (mob:- 09467206219)
HCL Infosystem Ltd. CHANDIGARH
E-mail:- prince.hclpkl at gmail.com
www.hclinfosystems.in
www.hcl.com

*Technology that touches lives** **TM*****

*[image: cid:image001.jpg at 01CB3EDF.FD2D61B0]*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110426/bb4672cd/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5671 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110426/bb4672cd/attachment.jpg>