[Linux-cluster] fencing issue in 2 nodes cluster
akinoztopuz at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 3 08:13:47 UTC 2012
dont take any error
and yes removed the method from command (default is onoff)
exact line is at below:
<fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" ipaddr="192.168.11.68" lanplus="1" login="clsfenceadmin" name="fence_node1" passwd="clsfenceadmin" power_wait="4" verbose="true"/>
and I tested fencing using manually (making a kernel crash:Digimer note) and command with fence_node node1 .
İt worked and services is relocated properly
From: Heiko Nardmann <heiko.nardmann at itechnical.de>
To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] fencing issue in 2 nodes cluster
Am 03.08.2012 09:12, schrieb AKIN ÿffffffffffd6ZTOPUZ:
>thanks all repilies
> I added verbose parameter into fence agent line in cluster.conf according to Heiko (verbose="true",method="onoff")
>and I read the web link sent by Digimer .I tested fencing using "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" on node1.
>after that I saw fencing occured and related services moved to other node properly.
>in this case can we say , fencing is ok ? or also should I use fence_node command on node for being sure?
No errors anymore? Did you reduce the number of parameters as
Digimer suggested? Then it would be maybe interesting for others to
see your working fence configuration as configured inside
I would suggest to test a little bit too much than doing not enough
testing ... ;-) ... debugging afterwards is more costly than doing
testing before ...
So my recommendation would be to test that manually started fencing,
too, to see whether any messages/errors appear.
After that you are probably fine ...
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux-cluster