[linux-lvm] Another strange setup by a newbie, but strange oops resulted while trying vgextend/vgmerge!
Joe Thornber
joe at 66bassett.freeserve.co.uk
Wed Jan 3 13:55:35 UTC 2001
> First, i ran into the same problems as reported before here on the list,
> vgmerge and vgextend give me OOPS while extending the LE counter for the
> VG.
Grab the latest code from the LVM_0-9-patches branch of cvs. You will
need to repatch/build the kernel module as well as the userland tools.
> other patches? (CVS snapshots are no choice!)
Then wait for the next release which shouldn't be too long.
> Ok, next ->
> What the heck are you guy's doing? I use a native RH6.2 installation w/o
> any updates/fixes (except for network security), using 2.2.17 and 2.2.18
> kernel-tarballs (the ..17 patches works well on ..18, only a few rejects
> which can easily inserted by hand;). But you CAN'T release a version that
> does not work w/o telling users if they had to look at some dependencies!
> (if there are some, remember i use a really clear RH6.2!)
???
The lvm-2.2.17 and 2.2.18 patches apply cleanly to the vanilla
kernel + rawio. The redhat kernel is almost certainly not a vanilla
kernel.
> reports and patches adressing this, but there's no help. And don't think
> all your users, who want to use LVM, are able to use CVS snapshots (i
> never use cvs snapshots on my server release is release features
> against bugs;).
I don't think 0.9 is quite ready for production systems. Maybe you
should play with 0.8.
- Joe
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list