[linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM
g.danti at assyoma.it
Fri Apr 14 07:27:20 UTC 2017
Il 13-04-2017 16:33 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
> Just let's repeat.
> Full thin-pool is NOT in any way comparable to full filesystem.
> Full filesystem has ALWAYS room for its metadata - it's not pretending
> it's bigger - it has 'finite' space and expect this space to just BE
> Now when you have thin-pool - it cause quite a lot of trouble across
> number of layers. There are solvable and being fixed.
> But as the rule #1 still applies - do not run your thin-pool out of
> space - it will not always heal easily without losing date - there is
> not a simple straighforward way how to fix it (especially when user
> cannot ADD any new space he promised to have)
> So monitoring pool and taking action ahead in time is always superior
> solution to any later postmortem systems restores.
If I remember correctly, EXT4 with error=remount-ro should freeze the
filesystem as soon as write errors are detected. Is this configuration
safer than standard behavior? Do you know if XFS (RHEL *default*
filesystem) supports something similar?
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
More information about the linux-lvm