[linux-lvm] vgcreate doesn't work with lvmlockd running
Zhiyong Ye
yezhiyong at bytedance.com
Fri May 6 13:27:17 UTC 2022
Hi David,
Thanks for your reply and detailed answer. It is true that It works fine
with the latest version of lvm as you said.
Thanks again!
Zhiyong
在 5/5/22 10:07 PM, David Teigland 写道:
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:08:36PM +0800, Zhiyong Ye wrote:
>> root at n151-143-035:~# lvmlockd -V
>> lvmlockd version: 2.03.02(2) (2018-12-18)
>> root at n151-143-035:~# sanlock -V
>> sanlock 3.6.0 (built Jul 11 2018 12:44:29)
>
>> It is mentioned in the main page under "creating the first sanlock VG"
>> that the first VG is created to get the global lock, so I create the VG
>> directly:
>>
>> root at n151-143-035:~# vgcreate --lock-type sanlock --shared test
>> /dev/mapper/mpatha1 --verbose
>
> This is correct.
>
>> Enabling sanlock global lock
>> Wiping signatures on new PV /dev/mapper/mpatha1.
>> Set up physical volume for "/dev/mapper/mpatha1" with 2147483648
>> available sectors.
>> Zeroing start of device /dev/mapper/mpatha1.
>> Writing physical volume data to disk "/dev/mapper/mpatha1".
>> Physical volume "/dev/mapper/mpatha1" successfully created.
>> Adding physical volume '/dev/mapper/mpatha1' to volume group 'test'
>> Archiving volume group "test" metadata (seqno 0).
>> Creating logical volume lvmlock
>> Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/test" (seqno 2).
>> Activating logical volume test/lvmlock.
>> activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking only
>> host tags for test/lvmlock.
>> Creating test-lvmlock
>> Loading table for test-lvmlock (254:1).
>> Resuming test-lvmlock (254:1).
>> /dev/test/lvmlock: not found: device not cleared
>> Aborting. Failed to wipe start of new LV.
>
> This looks like a bug, and it does look familiar. I'd guess that section
> of code is missing a call to synchronize with udev (sync_local_dev_names).
> Unfortunately your version of lvm (and sanlock) are old enough that it's
> hard to say immediately if it's fixed. The best option would be trying
> newer versions where it's most likely been fixed.
>
> Dave
>
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list