[Ovirt-devel] [PATCH server] Revised attempt at refactoring the vm_controller using the service layer.

David Lutterkort lutter at redhat.com
Wed Apr 22 18:31:02 UTC 2009


On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:26 -0400, Scott Seago wrote:
> So we have two different QMF objects for each AR type? i.e. for Foo we 
> have FooDef which maps to AR and FooService which maps to the 
> service/controller layer? Does it matter that FooService ignores FooDef 
> and uses the AR Foo class directly?

I am actually not sure what a VmDef object looks like agent side - I've
been thinking of them as little more than hashes of the properties we
expose over QMF; I don't think there's much point in having separate
classes for those, since all their behavior is handled by the QMF
'controller'.

David





More information about the ovirt-devel mailing list