[Ovirt-devel] Should we use "master" for development

[Perry Myers]

On 07/03/2011 06:44 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just pushed v2.0.0 tag to the master branch, Fedora build and ISO
> is in the works and will be announced separately.
> But this occasion made me thinking about our 'next' branch and I'm not
> sure I like it any more: this used to be the place to do development of
> new features and master was supposed to be for stable release only. This
> made confusion for most of the people expecting to see new development
> in the default branch they get after checkout, master.
> I'd like to propose we drop 'next' branch and have only 'master' in the
> upstream repo and do development there, like in other projects e.g.
> libvirt.git
> What do you think?

ack, go for it :)