[Ovirt-devel] Should we use "master" for development

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Perry Myers <pmyers at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2011 06:44 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just pushed v2.0.0 tag to the master branch, Fedora build and ISO
>> is in the works and will be announced separately.
>> But this occasion made me thinking about our 'next' branch and I'm not
>> sure I like it any more: this used to be the place to do development of
>> new features and master was supposed to be for stable release only. This
>> made confusion for most of the people expecting to see new development
>> in the default branch they get after checkout, master.
>> I'd like to propose we drop 'next' branch and have only 'master' in the
>> upstream repo and do development there, like in other projects e.g.
>> libvirt.git
>> What do you think?
>
> ack, go for it :)
>

I also think its a good idea.
I'd also consider creating a 2.0 stable branch though.