[Patternfly] Syntax hint wireframes

Jessica Ryhanych jryhanyc at redhat.com
Thu Jan 19 21:08:00 UTC 2017


Hey everyone! Thanks for all your comments.

I have updated wireframes and want to get your feedback: https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/QEA3WGEM6 <https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/QEA3WGEM6>

A few notes:
- We want to make 1 recommendation 
- Option 1 has the most votes / positive feedback at this point
- I tried to address a lot of the feedback with these wireframes and based them on the real form examples I received (thanks!)
- There are DT and mobile examples, as well as modal / dialog box layouts
- My recommendation is for Option #1 after this exercise

If we go with Option #1, we would need to specify guidelines for hint length (maybe a character limit?) and how often to use them on a single page. We could also do some testing to see if the disappearing text is a real challenge for users.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, thanks!
Jessica

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 

Jessica W. Ryhanych 
User Experience Design 
Red Hat
jryhanyc at redhat.com

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 1:13 PM, Serena Doyle <sdoyle at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I don't really have anything unique to add :)  Here's my opinion ... 
> 1/2 seems more "current" , but as a few people mentioned it's an issue once you start typing
> 4 seems like a good option, where the hint is replaced with validation problems, if there are any.  But that also means that the hints are hidden if you have to try again :) 
> 5 seems more "traditional", but conflicts with our form validation
> 6/7 to me is not a valid option 
> Personally i like #1 more
> 
> Looking forward to the solution!
> - Serena
> 
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Andreas Nilsson <anilsson at redhat.com <mailto:anilsson at redhat.com>> wrote:
> On 2017-01-16 20:15, Jessica Ryhanych wrote:
> Hey PatternFlyers,
> I’ve attached a few wireframes addressing the initial discovery work [1] on syntax hints. Please send your thoughts on which option we should move forward with as the recommendation and what issues you see with it, if any. Here we go:
> 
> 
> I Cockpit we currently use variant 1/2.
> A lot of our input is in dialogs in Cockpit and for 6/7, that would result in a lot of odd looking empty space on the right side of the inputs.
> To some extent that is true for 3/4 as well, but with regards to vertical space. How does this look when you have several inputs with hints after each other? It's a bit hard to judge it only from the most "clean" state.
> - Andreas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Patternfly mailing list
> Patternfly at redhat.com <mailto:Patternfly at redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Serena Chechile Doyle
> UXD | Unified Management Experience
> Red Hat
> Cell 508-769-7715 <tel:508-769-7715> | IRC - serena | Skype - serenamarie125 | Twitter - @serenamarie125
> _______________________________________________
> Patternfly mailing list
> Patternfly at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/patternfly/attachments/20170119/2636d0dd/attachment.htm>


More information about the PatternFly mailing list