[publican-list] --lang vs --langs
Ryan Lerch
rlerch at redhat.com
Fri Jun 11 01:21:42 UTC 2010
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 08:46 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 07:36 AM, Jaromir Hradilek wrote:
>
> Actually, I find this is a valuable semantic distinction for me as a
> user as well. Because you can perform some actions on multiple languages
> at a time, and some actions on only one language at a time, having to
> type the correct option helps me keep these separate in my mind.
>
> If the --lang and --langs options were to be mashed together, we'd
> really need an error message for the actions that can only be performed
> on one language at a time that says something like "You can only package
> one language at a time."
>
> Then of course people might wonder why we have an option called "langs"
> that only allows you to perform an action on a single language.
>
> Maybe we should just leave it as it is.
>
I agree,
the first time i used "publican package" i tried to specify multiple
langs with "langs=" but it failed. If the commands were mashed together,
what i tried to do would still fail, as i can only specify one lang when
building a package. allowing "langs=" to work will only confuse further.
my 2 cents: keep the distinction between langs= and lang=.
cheers,
ryanlerch
More information about the publican-list
mailing list