[Pulp-dev] docs-builder-2.10-build and docs-builder-2.11-build jenkins jobs

[Tanya Tereshchenko]

I agree that it makes sense at least to stop running 2.10-* docs 
builders on a regular basis because we do not expect any new 2.10.z release.
As for deletion I can see no harm here as well but then we should 
consider deleting builders for 2.8 and 2.9 as well.

Is there any other possible builds which we may need for docs except 
nightly, beta, rc and release? I think '-build' or '-testing' works for 
me, since it is going to be manual irregular build for testing :)

As discussed on IRC #pulp-dev, let's  talk to Sean about configs and 
version naming, so I am not making any PRs in that area till then.

Thanks,
Tanya

On 12/19/2016 02:53 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Thanks for explanation. That all sounds correct. Here are some related 
> thoughts regarding our docs builders. I'd like some feedback on these 
> ideas.
>
> I think we should delete all docs builders for 2.10- including the 
> -build, -release, and -dev builders. We don't use them anymore and the 
> docs will continue to be served without disruption.
>
> Should we rename the builders ending in '-build' builders to be 
> '-beta-or-rc'? Or maybe '-testing'?
>
> Also your PR is going to fix the two failing docs builders right? I 
> can review that if that is helpful. I'm hoping to see all the docs 
> builders go green.
>
> Thank you!
> Brian
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Tanya Tereshchenko 
> <ttereshc at redhat.com <mailto:ttereshc at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     I expected '.beta' or '.rc' to be present in the 'version' in
>     config [0] but according to the docs [1], this is not the case
>     because 2.11 is released.
>     I was not aware of that policy, so everything is correct :)
>
>     But when there will be Beta or RC version, expect docs to be
>     published at
>     http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/<pulp_version>/testing/
>     <http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/>*
>     *
>
>     [0]
>     https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/2.11-build.yaml#L10
>     <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/2.11-build.yaml#L10>
>     [1]
>     https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/README.md#xy-buildyaml
>     <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/README.md#xy-buildyaml>
>
>     Tanya
>
>
>     On 12/19/2016 11:07 AM, Tanya Tereshchenko wrote:
>>
>>     We have jobs for dev and release branches and this *-build ones
>>     are for the rest which is basically Beta and RC builds and they
>>     are triggered manually when needed. That's my understanding.
>>
>>     I expect them to be published under 'testing/', so for 2.11-build
>>     they should be here: http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/
>>     <http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/>*
>>     *because of the way path is constructed [0] [1].
>>
>>     I am looking at configs now and they do not seem to be correct to
>>     me. I'll make a PR to see if others agree.
>>
>>     [0]
>>     https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L75-L78
>>     <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L75-L78>
>>     [1]
>>     https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L170
>>     <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L170>
>>
>>     Tanya
>>
>>
>>     On 12/17/2016 08:26 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
>>>     These two Jenkins jobs are currently failing and I am not sure where they are supposed to publish docs to. Can someone explain what the purpose of these jobs is?  I'd like to fix them.
>>>
>>>     -Dennis
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>     Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Pulp-dev mailing list
>>     Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
>     _______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing
>     list Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20161219/a4fc1359/attachment.htm>