[Pulp-dev] Including the pulp-deb plugin in pulp 2.14

[Mihai Ibanescu]

I ran out of time looking into Smash. I may be able to try working on those
in the week of June 26-30.

If you can point me to some tools for recording the demo, I might be able
to work on one for the July 6, during the same week.

It may also be helpful if someone else is willing to do the demo - it's not
hugely entertaining to watch one upload a .deb file, publish the repo etc.

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> This is great! Thanks @misa. It looks like pulp_deb is ready to be
> included in 2.14!
>
> As an aside, I talked w/ @ichimonji10 yesterday who can help guide a pulp
> smash contribution. If we had pulp_smash tests for pulp_deb, they would run
> nightly against core to ensure compatibility and correctness of the
> pulp_deb workflow/codepaths.
>
> As a second aside, is there any way we could have a community demo of this
> prior to the launch of 2.14. The two demo dates prior to the GA of 2.14 are
> June 15th and July 6th. We can take either pre-recorded standalone videos
> or a live demo.
>
> Thanks again,
> Brian
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Testing on a pulp server with pulp-server-2.14.0-0.1.alpha.git.18878.518e345.fc24.noarch
>> (and its friends):
>>
>> pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-1-deb
>> pulp-admin deb repo uploads deb --repo-id test-1-deb -f
>> nscd_2.24-7ubuntu2_amd64.deb
>> pulp-admin deb repo publish run --repo-id test-1-deb
>>
>> Confirmed a debian repo got created.
>>
>> URL=https://my-server.example.com/pulp/deb/test-1-deb/
>> pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-2-deb --feed $URL
>> --verify-feed-ssl false --relative-url top/test-2-deb
>> pulp-admin deb repo sync run --repo-id test-2-deb
>>
>> Conformed a repo got created.
>>
>> pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-1-deb
>> pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-2-deb
>>
>>
>> I call that a success! :-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great. For now, we're just doing scratch builds to ensure things can be
>>> built without issue. Whatever version is merged when the 2.14 beta goes to
>>> be made[0] (tentatively July 5) is what will ship with 2.14 unless you tell
>>> us otherwise.
>>>
>>> Thanks Mihai!
>>>
>>> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/2140_Release_Status
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <
>>> mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As of now, 1.5.1 is what I am expecting.
>>>>
>>>> However, there are some very good contributions as PRs in the pipe, and
>>>> if I were to merge them they would probably result in 1.6.
>>>>
>>>> Mihai
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mihai, I'm interested to hear how the testing goes between pulp_deb
>>>>> and the master branch of core (what will become 2.14). Also I want to check
>>>>> in on the version number. Do you expect pulp_deb to be released as version
>>>>> 1.5.1? That is what is currently in the spec file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for all the testing and contribution!
>>>>> Brian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> both of the Tasks are added to the sprint, so they will be worked on
>>>>>> asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <
>>>>>> mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have had discussions on the IRC channel about adding pulp-deb
>>>>>>> (debian support for pulp) in 2.14.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have filed this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2802
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The unit tests pass against the master branch. I am in the process
>>>>>>> of installing a server from master to validate that things do indeed work
>>>>>>> as expected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe we need consensus that we should do it, and figure out
>>>>>>> what needs to be done and who will do that. At the very least,
>>>>>>> python-debpkgr would need to be packaged as an rpm and included in the yum
>>>>>>> repo (subtask https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2803)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170613/23c69798/attachment.htm>