[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Austin Macdonald]

My vote will be +0 for pulpproj to imitate pulpproject.org.

Since the only perfect option is "pulp" I doubt that we will come up with
anything that is great. That's ok though because this name shouldn't affect
very much. +1 to pushing this through, thanks Ina!

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> Team,
>
> we need to make some progress on this and try to find a common agreement.
> Based on the email thread, i will summarize the options which where
> proposed.
> I will highlight mainly the concerns brought up by people( where there
> have been expressed any).
> I would like to hear more feedback *here in the thread*  so later i can
> shrink the options and then i will create the Doodle for voting.
>
>
> 1) pulpproj, pulp_project, pulpproject.
>     - Some people are opposed to having any form of the word "project" as
> part of the name.
>     It's like having Firefox be named "firefoxproj".
>     Plus pulpproject is already taken.
> 2) pulp3
>     - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
> 3) plp - looks like pip
> 4) pulpapp vs pulp_app
> 5) pulp_platform
> 6) spot for new ideas
>
> I encourage you all to *speak your piece *before I would create the
> Doodle.
>
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 pulpapp
>> +0 pulpproj
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> we have not considered yet 'pulpapp'
>>>
>>> pip install pulpapp
>>> pip install pulpapp_cli
>>> pip install pulpapp_streamer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of
>>>> options.
>>>>
>>>> -1 pulp3
>>>> +0 pulpproj
>>>> -0 pulp_platform
>>>> -1 plp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the
>>>> current situation is the 'winner'.
>>>>
>>>> I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and
>>>> ask what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if
>>>> it is a good idea, though.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ina Panova
>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>
>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to pulpproj
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>>>>>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter
>>>>>> handle. Both
>>>>>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3
>>>>>> could be a
>>>>>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or
>>>>>> Python3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still +1 pulpproj
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170504/5cc56714/attachment.htm>