[Pulp-dev] Webserver owning the entire url namespace?
dkliban at redhat.com
Fri Nov 3 11:53:42 UTC 2017
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:
> We're looking at developing apache/nginx scripts, and I was thinking about
> documenting the webserver requirements. I think Pulp probably has to be
> rooted at / on any given site so that it can host live APIs. Users can
> still vhost multiple sites at other hostnames so I think it's ok, but I'm
> interested in what others think. I wrote this up here  for some
> discussion on the issue.
I like Pulp owning all the URLs for a hostname. This enables plugin writers
to provide any API endpoints they need without having to deploy a separate
Was there any good reason why this was not done for Pulp 2?
> : https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3114
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev