[Pulp-dev] Proposal to replace pulp 2.15's nightly jobs

[Preethi Thomas]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Patrick Creech <pcreech at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 11:35 -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > > > Hosting packages in just one place is simpler than hosting packages
> in multiple places.
> > > > There's
> > > > less room for error when the simpler thing is done.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It shouldn't be too hard to set up.
> >
> >
> > Fair enough. I also think that hosting packages on one location helps to
> prevent end-user
> > confusion. But we can host packages wherever is appropriate, and I don't
> have a terribly strong
> > opinion here.
>
> I'm already working on having the repo on koji generated in such a way
> that it rsyncs nicely over to
> the destination at fedorapeople with little effort.
>
> > > I would probably want to keep it in a 'nightly' or 'master'
> > > folder instead of a versioned folder, to help aign the intent of
> explicitly distinguishing this
> > > workflow from others.  Thoughts?
> >
> > Yes, please. If there's a directory called "2.15," then I think that
> there's a 2.15 release. If
> > there's a directory called "nightly" or "master," then I think that
> there are nightly builds, or
> > builds from master.
> >
> > To nitpick: I like the idea "master" a little bit more. What if we
> improved our development and
> > build processes so that there were two builds in a day? "master"
> reflects the idea that the builds
> > come from the master branch, whereas "nightly" reflects the idea that
> there's one build per day.
>
> I too like 'master' over 'nightly'.  +1 to using this term instead for
> what we consider the
> 'nightly' process.  (as we do, on frequent occasion, rebuild these
> packages before the next 'night'
> is to be ran to help with many things)


I have changed this on the Jenkins UI.

https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/view/Pulp%202%20-Master/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20171110/797021ae/attachment.htm>